Bibliographic record
Abstract
I have been organizing and leading earth-building workshops for 15 years. The initial goal was to remind people of this wonderful architectural heritage that should be protected as well as to try to reintroduce earth as a modern material. However, what I have noticed happening during the workshops goes beyond just the technical aspect of building with earth. I often witness the transformation of people who, at first, are very hesitant to get dirty, but then, with complete enjoyment, continue to work and build. In recent years, I have used earth as a tool for working with various communities for all kinds of creative experiments – from more intimate events in the village of Mošorin, through open workshops in the Almaš quarter in Novi Sad, to numerous events in many other places in Serbia and abroad – earth brings both some universal interpretations and some very specific ones for certain people, communities, and spaces. The serenity of working with the simplest material leads to a transformation that we witness on both an individual and collective level, proving that art can have a much greater and more profound impact than we can even imagine on our seemingly serious lives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.020 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".