MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117629600 · doi:10.31579/2578-8949/202

Bioengineered Kidney Regeneration and Transplantation: Progress, Challenges, and Translational Prospects

2025· article· W7117629600 on OpenAlex
Rehan Haider

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatology and Dermatitis · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of KarachiUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsRegeneration (biology)TransplantationRegenerative medicineKidneyTissue engineeringKidney transplantationAngiogenesisImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major limitation of the treatment for ESRD has been, and continues to be, the shortfall in available donor organs; this situation has fostered greater interest in the areas of regenerative medicine and bioengineered organ substitutes. Among all solid organs, the kidney represents one of the most complex targets for tissue engineering due to its highly specialized microarchitecture, dense vascularization, and integrated filtration and excretory functions. Recent advances in decellularization–recellularization technologies have demonstrated the feasibility of generating bioengineered kidneys capable of limited physiological function in preclinical models. This narrative review critically examines progress in kidney bioengineering, with particular emphasis on scaffold-based regeneration strategies, cellular repopulation approaches, bioreactor conditioning, and experimental transplantation outcomes. Animal studies have shown that acellular renal scaffolds prepared from native organs can maintain extracellular matrix cues that support cell adhesion, differentiation, and vascular reconstruction. Recellularization with endothelial and renal epithelial cells has allowed for partial restoration of filtration and urine production following orthotopic transplantation in rodent models. Although functional output remains substantially lower than that of native kidneys, even modest renal activity may have meaningful clinical implications for patients dependent on dialysis. This review synthesizes current experimental findings, discusses methodological limitations, and evaluates translational challenges, including immune compatibility, long-term graft viability, and scalability for human application. By integrating biological, engineering, and clinical perspectives, the paper highlights bioengineered kidneys as a promising yet evolving strategy that may one day complement or transform conventional renal replacement therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it