Selenium-Enriched Yeast Supplementation and Its Influence on Nerve Function Parameters and Oxidative Stress Markers in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), a prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus, poses a substantial clinical burden and has a detrimental impact on quality of life. This triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial investigated the effects of an 8-week supplementation with selenium-enriched yeast on DPN symptoms, neuropathy severity, pro-oxidant–antioxidant balance (PAB), and sexual satisfaction in individuals aged 40–70 years with DPN. Methods: Fifty participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a daily 200 μg dose of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast-derived selenium (in a 500 mg capsule) or a placebo. Outcomes were assessed using validated tools: The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) for symptoms, the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) for severity, the Larson Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSSQ), and serum PAB levels via a specialized assay. Analyses followed a modified intention-to-treat approach, with ANCOVA and logistic regression used to adjust for confounders. Results: Post-intervention, both groups exhibited significant reductions in neuropathy symptoms (selenium: p < 0.001; placebo: p = 0.001), though intergroup differences were non-significant [adjusted mean difference (aMD): –0.92; 95% CI: –1.9 to 0.10]. Neuropathy severity decreased significantly in the selenium group (p = 0.002) but not in the placebo group. While PAB levels declined markedly with selenium (p = 0.001), the between-group difference was non-significant (aMD: –32.1; 95% CI: –66.02 to 1.87). Sexual satisfaction scores improved significantly in the selenium group versus the placebo group (aMD: 8.51; 95% CI: 0.74 to 16.28). Conclusion: These findings suggest that selenium-enriched yeast supplementation may enhance biochemical markers (PAB) and quality-of-life parameters (sexual satisfaction) in DPN. However, its limited efficacy in improving neuropathy-specific outcomes underscores the need for larger trials to clarify its therapeutic potential. Clinical Trial Registration: This trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20131009014957N10, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=IRCT20131009014957N10).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".