MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117658609 · doi:10.1093/inthealth/ihaf157

Reframing climate disasters through the lens of a climate necropolitics of health

2025· article· en· W7117658609 on OpenAlexafffund
Anushka Ataullahjan, Lesley Gittings

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransboundary Water Resource Management
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council
KeywordsCognitive reframingClimate changeColonialismClimate scienceClimate justiceBiopower

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A climate necropolitics of health offers a critical framework that illuminates how climate change disproportionately harms marginalized populations by highlighting how the lives of certain individuals are protected and whose lives are expendable. We demonstrate how entrenched gender inequity, colonial legacies and systemic underinvestment in health and education have had negative health impacts for women and girls in the Swat Valley in Pakistan. We propose that a climate necropolitics of health asks us to move beyond seeing climate disasters as an isolated event, instead locating them in broader histories of environmental injustice, structural violence and social exclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational HealthSame topicTransboundary Water Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207