Genome-wide association studies identify genetic determinants of synucleinopathy biomarkers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective α-synucleinopathies are clinically and biologically heterogeneous disorders lacking reliable biomarkers to assist with early diagnosis, disease progression, patient stratification, and therapeutic targeting. Genetic variation is known to impact biomarker levels, influencing their utility and interpretation in research and clinical settings. We aimed to identify common genetic modulators of biomarker levels implicated in α-synucleinopathy pathogenesis. Methods Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) were conducted on 63 CSF, plasma, and urine biomarkers in 581 individuals from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI). Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, disease status, and principal components. PD- and DLB-risk loci associations were separately assessed for each GWAS. Results We confirm strong associations between urine bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate (BMP) isoforms and the variants LRRK2 p.G2019S and GBA1 p.N370S, while providing support for BMPs use as a LRRK2 -PD biomarker. CSF Aβ was significantly associated with an APOE ε4 allele, reinforcing its central role in amyloid regulation. Novel associations were detected between CSF ceramide isoforms the MCF2L2 and GMNN loci, and between CSF tau and the TP63 locus. Multiple PD risk loci, including MAPT , SIPA1L2 , MCCC1 , and RAB29 , were associated with lysosomal lipid biomarkers, highlighting pathway-level convergence. Interpretation The present study reveals established and novel genetic modulators of potential α-synucleinopathy biomarkers, demonstrating that genetic background significantly shapes biomarker levels. These genetic influences should be accounted for when conducting biomarker-based research, clinical trials, or therapeutic development to ensure accurate interpretation and improve their translational relevance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".