System-level simulation of antimonide focal plane arrays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comprehensive multiphysics simulation framework was developed to systematically assess the key performance metrics of antimonide-based infrared detectors across various pixel structures and operating conditions. The study focuses on modulation transfer function (MTF), optical and electrical crosstalk, and noise equivalent temperature difference (NETD). Simulation results reveal that lateral carrier diffusion is the dominant factor contributing to MTF degradation. Moreover, parameters such as fill factor, bias voltage, pixel size, and integration time exhibit complex interdependencies that significantly affect overall device performance. The analysis further highlights the intricate interplay between structural design and thermal noise constraints, which is especially pronounced in dual-band detectors. This work provides a systematic understanding of the intrinsic influence of structural parameters on detector performance and offers theoretical guidance for the miniaturization and high-performance integration of antimonide-based infrared focal plane arrays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it