Development of PBAT-Modified Photopolymer Resin Micro-Composites for More Sustainable SLA Additive Manufacturing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photopolymer resins commonly utilized in stereolithography (SLA) additive manufacturing are non-renewable, brittle in nature and have low impact and thermal insulation properties, limiting their applications in sustainable and functional applications. To overcome these shortcomings, this paper introduces the initial research on the use of Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate (PBAT), a biodegradable polymer, into SLA resins to create partially sustainable micro-composites with enhanced mechanical and thermal capabilities. PBAT micropowder was mixed with standard resin at 1, 5 and 10 wt% and 3D printed using SLA. To determine performance and interfacial morphology, mechanical testing (tensile and impact), thermal conductivity measurements and SEM fracture surface analysis were carried out. Introduction of PBAT significantly increased toughness, flexibility and the impact strength of the 1% PBAT composite stood at 168.63 J/m2 with 68.69 J/m2 of pure resin whereas the 10% PBAT sample was found to be 16% more efficient in thermal insulation. These findings indicate that partially replacing the photopolymer resin with biodegradable PBAT can enhance impact strength and thermal insulation while reducing the overall amount of petrochemical resin required. The article provides a new avenue of eco-friendly, high-performance photopolymer composites to facilitate sustainable additive manufacturing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".