MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117715643 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v8i2.46249

RELATIVE AEROBIC LOAD OF DAILY ACTIVITIES IN INDIVIDUALS WITH LOWER LIMB AMPUTATION: A PILOT STUDY

2025· article· en· W7117715643 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Loeke van Schaik, Klaske van Kammen, Saskia Huiberts, Jan H. Geertzen, Han Houdijk, Rienk Dekker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
KeywordsGeneralizability theoryRehabilitationReliability (semiconductor)Task (project management)Lower limbAerobic exerciseActivities of daily living

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Individuals with lower limb amputation (LLA) often experience reduced physical capacity and increased aerobic demands during activities of daily living (ADL), which may impact participation and quality of life. Measuring the relative aerobic load of ADL is essential to set realistic rehabilitation goals, however data on short and non-steady-state ADL tasks in this population are limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a newly developed protocol for assessing the relative aerobic load of five selected ADL tasks in individuals with LLA, and to determine the applicability of the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) method for these measurements. METHODOLOGY: Six individuals with unilateral LLA (mean age 59 ± 9 years; five males), including three with transtibial, one with knee disarticulation, and two with transfemoral amputation, all classified as K2–K3 ambulators, were recruited for this pilot study and underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) during the first assessment session. During the second assessment session, within a two-week interval, participants were asked to perform five standardized tests reflecting ADL tasks: the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), Glittre ADL test, stair ascent, and stair descent. Oxygen consumption was measured using the COSMED K5 system. For each task, average oxygen consumption was computed as the total oxygen uptake during activity and recovery (EPOC) divided by total time, and relative aerobic load was defined as percentage of first ventilatory threshold (%V̇O2-VT1). Data analysis involved descriptive feasibility assessment and intraclass correlation to examine consistency of relative aerobic load across tasks. FINDINGS: The protocol showed to be feasible and no (serious) adverse events occurred during the study and 5 out of 6 participants were able to complete the protocol, demonstrating its practicality. The EPOC method was successfully applied to both short and longer-duration ADL tasks. The results showed relative aerobic loads exceeding 100% V̇O₂-VT₁ for most ADL tasks, indicating substantial physical effort. Agreement of the rankings of the different tasks between participants was observed (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.01-0.97), although the wide confidence interval indicates considerable uncertainty. CONCLUSION: This protocol enables the assessment of relative aerobic load in a heterogeneous group of individuals with LLA and highlights the importance of individualized assessment. Given the large variability in V̇O₂peak and V̇O₂-VT₁ between participants, a generic level of physiological burden for each task cannot be given, instead individualized assessment is crucial to accurately determine physiological burden and avoid under- or overestimation of exercise intensity. The findings support the development of individualized rehabilitation programs tailored to individual capabilities and limitations, potentially improving participation and quality of life. Additionally, future studies with larger cohorts are needed to provide more robust reliability estimates and strengthen the generalizability of these findings. Layman's Abstract Individuals with a lower limb amputation (LLA) often have lower physical ability and need extra effort to do everyday activities such as walking or climbing stairs. This extra effort can lead to fatigue and affect their independence and quality of life. To improve rehabilitation, it is important to understand how physically demanding these activities are. In this pilot study, six individuals with LLA participated in a new test protocol. At the first assessment session, they completed a fitness test. At the second assessment session, conducted within a two-week interval, they performed five common daily tasks: 1) walking for six minutes, 2) standing up and sitting down, 3) climbing stairs, 4) descending stairs, and 5) completing a functional activity course. During these tasks, they wore a portable device that measured oxygen use, showing how hard their body was working. The study showed that the protocol was safe and practical, and five of the six participants completed all tasks without difficulty. It also showed that a method called EPOC (excess post-exercise oxygen consumption) can measure the effort of short and irregular activities such as those above, which is usually hard to assess. Results revealed that most tasks required very high effort, which could lead to fatigue. Importantly, the effort varied greatly between individuals, highlighting the need for individualized assessments. Understanding these physiological differences can help healthcare professionals design rehabilitation programs tailored to each individual’s abilities. This approach can reduce fatigue, improve independence, and hopefully enhance quality of life for individuals with LLA. Future studies with larger groups are needed to confirm these findings and provide stronger evidence of their reliability. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/46249/34696 How To Cite: van Schaik L, van Kammen K, Huiberts S.W.M, Geertzen J.H.B, Houdijk H, Dekker R. Relative aerobic load of daily activities in individuals with lower limb amputation: A pilot study. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2025; Volume 8, Issue 2, No. 8. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v8i2.46249 Corresponding Author: Loeke van Schaik, PhDAffiliation: University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.E-Mail: L.van.Schaik@umcg.nl ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5288-1143

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207