Integrating Polymeric 3D-Printed Microneedles with Wearable Devices: Toward Smart and Personalized Healthcare Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wearable healthcare is shifting from passive tracking to active, closed-loop care by integrating polymeric three-dimensional (3D)-printed microneedle arrays (MNAs) with soft electronics and wireless modules. This review surveys the design, materials, and the manufacturing routes that enable skin-conformal MNA wearables for minimally invasive access to the interstitial fluid and precise but localized drug delivery. Looking ahead, the converging advances in multimaterial printing, nano/biofunctional coatings, and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven control are promising "wearable clinics" that can personalize monitoring and therapy in real time, thus accelerating the translation of MNA-integrated wearables from laboratory prototypes to clinically robust, patient-centric systems. Overall, this review identifies a clear transition from proof-of-concept MNA devices toward integrated, wearable, and closed-loop therapeutic platforms. Key challenges remain in scalable manufacturing, drug dose limitations, long-term stability, and regulatory translation. Addressing these gaps through advances in hollow MNA architectures, system integration, and standardized evaluation protocols is expected to accelerate clinical adoption. However, the realization of closed-loop wearable MNA-based systems remains constrained by challenges related to power consumption, real-time data latency, and the need for robust clinical validation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".