MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117734222 · doi:10.62810/jnsr.v3i4.340

Modelling and Forecasting Wholesale Potato Prices in Northern India Using SARIMA

2025· article· W7117734222 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Surbhi Bansal, Ayaz Khan Nasiri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural Science Review · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicForecasting Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUttar pradeshAutoregressive integrated moving averageAgricultureDistribution (mathematics)Market priceQuarter (Canadian coin)Price indexFood prices

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Farmers face many difficulties as a result of price fluctuation in agricultural commodities, mostly in developing nations like India. Potato prices are particularly unstable during the post-harvest period, which frequently forces farmers to sell at low prices because of urgent financial needs and delayed market information. The objective of this study is to use the Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model to forecast monthly wholesale potato prices. Three important markets in Northern India i.e. Uttar Pradesh, a significant producer, Punjab, a distribution hub, and Delhi, a major consumption center were studied for price trends. The AGMARKNET portal was used to collect monthly wholesale price data from January 2010 to December 2024. The best fitted SARIMA models were determined using the lowest AIC and BIC values: SARIMA(2,0,0)(2,0,1)[12] for Uttar Pradesh, SARIMA(1,0,1)(1,1,1)[12] for Punjab, and SARIMA(1,0,1)(0,1,1)[12] for Delhi. Forecast results reveal clear seasonal patterns. Prices in Uttar Pradesh are expected to decline from Rs. 1986.61 in January to a low of Rs. 1629.92 in April, before rising again to Rs. 1821.96 in July. Similarly, the lowest forecasted prices are observed in March and April in Punjab (Rs. 1546.22) and Delhi (Rs. 1664.95), while the highest price is projected for October in Delhi (Rs. 2039.61). The observed patterns suggest that the post-harvest months, specifically from February to April, typically see a decline in prices attributed to market saturation. Conversely, prices tend to increase during the mid to late year period, likely influenced by a decrease in fresh arrivals and a heightened dependence on stored produce. The forecast emphasizes the importance of market-specific dynamics and illustrates the effectiveness of predictive models in assisting farmers marketing decisions. This enables improved planning by traders and policymakers to address seasonal price volatility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural Science ReviewSame topicForecasting Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207