The effect of the terumo band used for hemostasis after transradial angiography on extremity pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate pain associated with the use of the Terumo band pneumatic compression device in patients undergoing transradial angiography. Materials and Methods: This descriptive study was conducted with 100 patients between October 2022 and October 2023. Data was collected using a demographic data form, the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and a Pain Assessment Form. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, and ANOVA were used for data analysis. Results: The mean pain score was 6.74 ± 6.99 one hour after application of the Terumo band and 3.81 ± 4.63 one hour after removal (t = 6.716; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Patients experienced pain both during and after the application of the Terumo band. As a recommendation for nursing practice, it is suggested that nurses continue pain assessment following transradial angiography and employ evidence-based interventions such as finger exercises, hot/cold application, and elevation to manage pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".