MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117749959 · doi:10.21801/ppcrj.2025.113.9

Effects of Walking on LDL Cholesterol and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Women: A Scoping Review

2025· article· W7117749959 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beatrice Domiciano, Diala Burjak, Alice Rosati, Jimena Gonzalez, Juliana Sumita, Ellenore Cheung, Agustina Piczman, Raed Althebati, Ismael Sumita, Maria Francisca Bosch, Efren Aguilar, Leonardo Simeth, Luisa Lutaka, Maria Melendez, Miguel Rodrigues, Isabella Pineda Staebler, Maria Isabel França, Camille Morice Herrero, Aline Medeiros, Brazil Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR)

Bibliographic record

VenuePrinciples and Practice of Clinical Research Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerobic exerciseBody mass indexPsychological interventionPostmenopausal womenMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialPhysical activitySystematic reviewLipid profileExercise physiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Postmenopausal women face an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. While aerobic physical activity is widely recommended, the specific effect of walking on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains unclear. LDL-C is a key modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, yet it has been inconsistently evaluated in exercise-focused studies. This scoping review aimed to examine LDL-C as a cardiometabolic outcome in studies evaluating walking-based aerobic interventions among postmenopausal women. Methods: A scoping review was conducted between April and June 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published between 2010 and 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort, and cross-sectional studies evaluating walking as an aerobic intervention in postmenopausal women and reporting outcomes on LDL-C (primary outcome), body mass index (BMI), or glucose (secondary outcomes). Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed risk of bias using RoB 2 and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Nine studies comprising 3,629 postmenopausal women aged 45–75 years met the inclusion criteria, with walking defined as aerobic physical activity performed at a moderate intensity threshold. Interventions varied in duration, intensity, and supervision. Only two studies reported significant reductions in LDL-C, whereas six found no significant change. BMI reductions were observed in three studies, and all three studies reporting glucose outcomes demonstrated improvement. Substantial heterogeneity in study design and intervention protocols limited comparability, and most studies were judged to be at high risk of bias. Conclusion: Walking-based aerobic interventions may improve some cardiometabolic markers in postmenopausal women; however, effects on LDL-C are inconsistent. Future studies should employ standardized walking protocols, ensure adequate intervention duration and supervision, and consistently assess LDL-C over time to clarify its role as a cardiovascular risk marker in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.048
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.205
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0480.205
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.220
GPT teacher head0.567
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrinciples and Practice of Clinical Research JournalSame topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207