MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117761323 · doi:10.59896/pesolah.v1i2.566

PERAN PEREMPUAN DALAM PENINGKATAN EKONOMI MASYARAKAT DI DESA TEGAL MAJA KECAMATAN TANJUNG, KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA

2025· article· W7117761323 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gugun Saputra

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of CambridgeInternational Development Research CentreUniversitas Bengkulu
KeywordsEmpowermentQuality (philosophy)Production (economics)Human resourcesWomen's empowermentQualitative researchEconomic impact analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Women's freedom to innovate and express themselves in this era has both positive and negative impacts. A positive impact is that women can be independent in meeting their economic needs, either as employees or as traders. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of women in improving the community's economy in Tegal Maja Village, Tanjung District, North Lombok Regency. This research is a survey with a qualitative approach. Data collection was conducted through direct observation, interviews, and documentation. The results show that women contribute to the household economy. Women's involvement in gardening activities also plays a role in strengthening family food security. By managing productive gardens, women ensure the availability of sufficient local food and improve the family's nutritional quality through fresh food consumption. Women's role in gardening activities in Tegal Maja Village also encourages local economic empowerment through the utilization of existing resources and skills. Production activities, simple processing, and marketing of garden produce provide women with experience in business management, market negotiations, and household income management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan HumanioraSame topicFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207