MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Whittle Index-Based Scheduling for Age of Information Minimization in IoT Networks

2025· article· W7117767531 on OpenAlexaff
Arian Morteza, Dongyu Qiu, Yousef R. Shayan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMQTTScheduling (production processes)Markov decision processJob shop schedulingQueueing theoryMinificationMarkov processInternet of ThingsServer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) protocol has become a widely adopted standard in IoT systems due to its lightweight and energy-efficient publish/subscribe architecture. However, ensuring timely data delivery remains a challenge, especially for applications requiring fresh information. In this paper, we address this issue by integrating the Age of Information (AoI) metric into the MQTT framework. We formulate the MQTT-AoI optimization problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and propose a novel Whittle index-based scheduling policy. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach effectively minimizes AoI while satisfying resource constraints. Furthermore, we show that the dual variable converge, ensuring the algorithm reaches a feasible solution under the hard constraints. This work provides a practical solution for managing information freshness in MQTT-based IoT networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207