MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117769332 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/ktgdx

Factors influencing oral health behaviours in pregnant women

2025· other· W7117769332 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Minalli Vasandani, Mark Avery, Sameer Deshpande, Nicolie Jenkins

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2025
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusOral hygieneOral healthHygieneHealth professionalsDental healthPregnancySocial class

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P (Population): Pregnant women in the US, UK, New Zealand, Australia, Europe, and Canada. I (Intervention/Exposure): Oral hygiene behaviours (e.g., toothbrushing frequency, flossing, use of mouthwash, dental visits, adherence to professional advice). C (Comparison): Not applicable (though studies comparing different subgroups may be included). O (Outcome): Factors influencing oral hygiene behaviours (e.g., barriers, facilitators, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, socioeconomic status, education healthcare access, cultural influences, psychological factors, and social determinants).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0090.013
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9180.937

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)French-language works237,207