MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117781041 · doi:10.54097/cvwcs829

International Media Pressure and Labor Migration Policy Reform in Authoritarian Regimes

2025· article· W7117781041 on OpenAlexaff
Hao Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic journal of management and social sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Canadian institutionsToronto Arts FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuthoritarianismScrutinyInternational relationsMedia coverageCompliance (psychology)Refugee

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to investigate the causal relationship between international media pressure and labor migration policy reform in authoritarian states. It hypothesizes that a higher level of international media pressure increases the intensity of policy reform to improve migrant conditions. The paper uses a comparison of three Gulf states’ cases under different reputational pressures, including Qatar, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Kuwait. Findings suggest that Qatar, under intense global scrutiny during the preparation of the FIFA World Cup, implemented notable policy reform. UAE implements a partial adjustment. Kuwait, with limited international scrutiny, largely resists the policy reform. The case study suggests that despite all three regimes being structurally similar in their regimes and dependency on migrant worker, their depth of policy reform varies accordingly with their exposure to international media pressure. Global media pressure drives authoritarian regimes to implement labor reform as a symbolic move to secure their international legitimacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademic journal of management and social sciencesSame topicMiddle East and Rwanda ConflictsFrench-language works237,207