Applications of Machine Learning for Cognitive Health in Older Individuals With HIV: Rapid Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: More than half of people with HIV are now older than 50 years, and they face an approximately 60% higher risk of developing dementia compared with the general population. In recent years, the application of artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning, combined with the growing availability of large datasets, has opened new avenues for developing prediction models that improve dementia detection, monitoring, and management. Objective: This systematic review aimed to synthesize the existing literature on the application of machine learning in dementia research among older people with HIV and identify directions for future research. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase in September 2024, limited to studies published within the past 10 years. Eligible articles included original research involving people with HIV applying at least 1 machine learning technique and reporting dementia-related outcomes. Results: The search yielded 721 articles, of which 26 (3.6%) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective and conducted in the United States (n=14, 53.8%), primarily focusing on neurocognitive impairment and HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Supervised machine learning techniques were most frequently used and demonstrated strong predictive performance. Common methodological challenges included small sample sizes, lack of external validation, limited participant diversity, and concerns about biological interpretability and generalizability. Conclusions: Machine learning research on dementia among older people with HIV primarily targets HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, with limited exploration of age-related neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease and related dementias. The absence of longitudinal studies and external validation remains a key limitation. Future research should broaden the focus to all-cause dementia beyond HIV-specific conditions; apply advanced machine learning methods; and leverage large-scale longitudinal, multimodal datasets. Strengthening methodological rigor and enhancing real-world applications will be critical to improving early detection and effective management of cognitive health in this unique aging population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".