MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117873310 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18107972

Customer Product Choice Recommendation By Association Rules And Learning Models

2025· article· W7117873310 on OpenAlex
Keerti Pal, Jayshree Boaddh, Rahul Patidar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer churn and segmentation
Canadian institutionsSciencetech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurchasingAssociation rule learningBoosting (machine learning)Ensemble learningProduct (mathematics)Recommender systemCustomer intelligenceNormalization (sociology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Online stores and apps attracts customer at various levels. So approaches need to be more effective by analyzing the behavior of visiting customer. Many of researcher has proposed different models of customer product recommendation system. This paper introduces a novel Customer Product Recommendation by Rules and Ensemble Model (CPRRESM) framework designed to enhance purchase prediction accuracy for small-scale retail stores with limited data resources. The proposed approach integrates Apriori-based association rule mining for pattern discovery, Z-score normalization for feature standardization, and a Gradient Boosting ensemble model for efficient learning. By combining rule-based insights with ensemble learning, CPRRESM effectively captures customer purchasing behavior and dynamic preferences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it