5G and Radar Coexistence: Demonstrating Pulsed Radar Interference and 5G Performance Metrics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The escalating demand for wireless spectrum necessitates more effective coexistence strategies between commercial 5G networks and incumbent radar systems. Unlike traditional approaches that permit spectrum access to only one system at a time, this demonstration directly investigates the real time performance impacts on 5G communications under simultaneous radar interference. Our approach leverages a low cost, flexible, and modular experimental platform integrating commercial user equipment (UE) and software defined radios (SDRs). The demonstration highlights the effects of pulsed radar interference on key 5G metrics including UE throughput, uplink (UL) SINR, and downlink (DL) SNR, through live spectrum visualization and performance monitoring. Iterative test cycles allow systematic variation of radar parameters such as pulse repetition frequency (PRF) and duty cycles, fostering interactive discussions on practical coexistence scenarios. Preliminary results illustrate that simultaneous radar and 5G operation is feasible under certain conditions, providing valuable insights into optimizing future spectrum sharing deployments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it