Digital-Twin Empowered Site-Specific Radio Resource Management in 5G Aerial Corridor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Base station (BS) association and beam selection in multi-cell drone corridor networks present unique challenges due to the high altitude, mobility and three-dimensional movement of drones. These factors lead to frequent handovers and complex beam alignment issues, especially in environments with dense BS deployments and varying signal conditions. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a channel-twin (CT) enabled resource-allocation framework for drone-corridor communications, where the CT constitutes the radio-channel component of a broader digital-twin (DT) environment. The CT supplies high-fidelity channel-state information (CSI), which drives a two-stage optimization procedure. In Stage 1, array-level beamforming weights at each BS are selected to maximize antenna gain. In Stage 2, the framework jointly optimizes drone–BS–beam associations at discrete corridor waypoints to maximize end-to-end throughput. Simulation results confirm that the CT-driven strategy delivers significant throughput gains over baseline methods across diverse operating scenarios, validating the effectiveness of integrating precise digital-twin channel models with cross-layer resource optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".