MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117893037 · doi:10.48185/jaai.v6i2.1461

Ensemble-based Intrusion Detection System for Electric Vehicles Charging Stations using Machine Learning

2025· article· W7117893037 on OpenAlex
K C Bishal, Kshitiz Aryal, Sansrit Paudel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Artificial Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntrusion detection systemSupport vector machineDecision treeElectric vehicleInterconnectivityConvolutional neural networkArtificial neural networkIntrusionSmart grid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional Vehicles have an adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the current technological shift is constantly seeking an alternative to replace traditional vehicles fueled by fossil fuels, and Electric vehicles are, so far, the best alternative. The adoption of Electric Vehicles (EVs) is growing rapidly due to their eco-friendly benefits and technological advancements. This growth, however, brings a significantly larger attack surface due to increased interconnectivity between electric vehicles, charging stations and the smart grid system. To prevent such types of attacks, we need a robust system to detect them beforehand and prevent the system from being compromised. Although some prior work has been conducted in this area, their approaches did not incorporate deep learning algorithms, nor did they evaluate model performance under noisy data conditions. Therefore, we proposed a novel ensemble-based intrusion detection system (IDS) to detect these attacks in Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS). We implement different Machine learning algorithms such as k-nearest neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT). Moreover, as different types of malwares often exhibit distinct structural characteristics when visualized as images, we also use Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to detect such attacks and malware. We are focusing on detecting attacks in Electric vehicle charging stations by analyzing the network traffic. For this, we utilize the latest labelled dataset, the Canadian Institute of Cybersecurity EV Charger Attack Dataset 2024 (CICEVSE2024), which is a multidimensional dataset containing both benign and attack data. We then evaluate & compare the performance of these algorithm in detecting the network traffic attacks in Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS). Our proposed model employs an ensemble voting strategy to combine the predictions from different classifiers, thereby improving the system's robustness and accuracy, and achieves an accuracy of 99.5% in detecting cyberattacks. With the addition of small noise to the dataset, a few individual classifiers perform poorly; however, the ensemble model still maintains an accuracy of 99.2%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it