Abstracts of the Free Communications of the 11th Libyan Cardiac Society Congress (CARDIO-LIBYA 11), November 7–9, 2025, Tripoli, Libya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The 11th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Libyan Cardiac Society (CardioLibya 11), held in Tripoli from November 7 to 9, 2025, in conjunction with the 4th Pan-Arab Heart Failure Conference and the Kawasaki Disease Arab Initiative session, featured over 100 scientific presentations and 14 hands-on workshops across adult and pediatric cardiovascular care. A total of 48 abstracts were submitted, and 39 were accepted following rigorous peer review. These were categorized into adult oral presentations (6), pediatric oral presentations (5), and poster presentations (28). Key themes included structural heart disease, congenital heart anomalies, cardiac imaging, heart failure, valvular surgery, cardiometabolic risk factors, cardiac rehabilitation, and health system innovation in resource-limited settings. Top abstracts in each category received the Dr. Mahmoud Tarhuni Research Award. This compendium aims to disseminate recent findings and foster collaboration among cardiovascular specialists regionally and globally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.262 | 0.063 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".