MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117949945

Preparación de las condiciones de habilitación para el consultorio odontológico JIREH

2019· article· W7117949945 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yeimmy Alejandra Rodríguez Larios, Adriana Marcela Martínez Godoy

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2019
Typearticle
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatistical analysisResearch methodologyPopulationQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo de grado se llevó a cabo en el consultorio odontológico JIREH ubicado en Bogotá - Colombia en el barrio Villa Alsacia, para obtener el título de especialista en Gerencia y Auditoria de la Calidad de la Salud, durante el primer semestre del 2019. Está basado en la resolución 2003 del 2014, a partir del cual se crean los criterios mínimos de habilitación del servicio de salud. Objetivo: Preparar las condiciones de habilitación del consultorio odontológico JIREH de acuerdo a la resolución ya mencionada. Materiales y métodos: se aplicó una metodología descriptiva y evaluativa que pudo establecer de forma detallada si el consultorio cumple con los estándares de habilitación descritos en la norma. Se aplicó lista de chequeo y posterior un informe describiendo los estándares. Resultados: se pudo evidenciar que el consultorio cumple con un % de los estándares de habilitación y que solo un % falta por cumplir. Conclusión: como la norma es muy clara y dice que se debe cumplir con el 100% de los criterios establecidos en la norma y aún hay criterios que no cumple, no puede obtener la aprobación de habilitación

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicHealth and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207