MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7118070039 · doi:10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_100_25

The unseen hand in the operating room: Harnessing artificial intelligence to redefine surgical excellence

2025· article· en· W7118070039 on OpenAlexaff
Angeline Neetha Radjou, Devi Prasad Mohapatra, Amit Kumar Dey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellenceProcess (computing)Health carePatient careApplications of artificial intelligenceSelection (genetic algorithm)ToolboxDomain (mathematical analysis)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surgery, long considered a unique domain in health care, is on the threshold of transformation. Artificial intelligence (AI) is silently working alongside the steely resolve of a surgeon to make surgical care data-driven. This shift is leading to more efficient, safe, and personalized patient care across the entire surgical journey, from preoperative planning to postoperative recovery. AI is poised to act as a catalyst, augmenting the capabilities of surgeons to make care more predictive, personalized, and precise. However, tapping its potential, particularly within the complex and resource-varied landscape of a country like India, requires a deep understanding of the technical, economic, and cultural aspects of healthcare. Simply adopting market-ready technology without careful consideration can lead to chaos. The true power of AI in surgery can only be harnessed if it is thoughtfully integrated into clinical workflows, deployed at every step of the patient journey, and guided by a structured approach with a human in the loop. PRECISE PATIENT SELECTION AI is refining the critical process of patient selection for surgical procedures, helping to stratify risk, reduce bias, and improve efficacy.[1] AI adoption in Indian healthcare is growing, with notable applications emerging in this domain.[2] Real-world use cases include AI models that predict which patients with inguinal hernias are at high risk of strangulation, thereby prioritizing them for surgery, and models that predict patient decision-making in refractive surgery.[3] Institutions use AI to identify high-risk patients, evaluate potential donors, and better match organs with recipients.[4] INTRAOPERATIVE WORKFLOWS: ENHANCING PRECISION AND EFFICIENCY Inside the operating room (OR), AI is actively reshaping workflows by focusing on process management, safety, and efficiency. A 2021 review from Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai highlights several key applications in this domain.[5] AI algorithms can analyze video feeds from laparoscopic or endoscopic cameras to automatically recognize the current phase of a procedure, such as incision, dissection, or closure. This serves as a foundation for multiple workflow improvements.[6] Instrument Tracking using Computer vision can help throughout a procedure, which helps prevent retained surgical items, a serious but preventable complication. Tracking Automated Documentation[7] can be done by identifying surgical phases. AI can automatically log the timing and duration of each step, creating an accurate, objective record of the operation and reducing the manual documentation AI can automatically log the timing and duration of each step, creating an accurate, objective record of the operation and reducing the manual documentation burden on staff. Real-time phase recognition helps optimize the flow of the OR, anticipating the need for specific instruments or alerting team members to upcoming critical stages, thereby improving overall efficiency.[8] OPTIMIZING THE OPERATING ROOM: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-DRIVEN SCHEDULING AI is also transforming the complex puzzle of OR scheduling by moving beyond manual methods to create dynamic and efficient surgical timetables. AI platforms like Getinge’s Torin have improved surgery time predictions by up to 34%. A study at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences found that an AI tool improved case length accuracy by 30%, saving an estimated 40 wasted OR hours annually. By analyzing billions of permutations, AI can generate optimal schedules that maximize resource use. This allows for dynamic, real-time adjustments; if a surgery is delayed or canceled, the system can re-sequence the schedule to prevent idle OR time. This leads to significant cost savings, reduced waste, improved patient flow, and better management of resources like staff and post-anaestheisa care unit (PACU) beds. While advanced platforms are more common in North America and Europe, these principles are highly relevant to India.[9] POSTOPERATIVE AND DISCHARGE In the crucial postoperative period, AI revolutionizes patient management by moving away from standardized protocols toward highly personalized care plans. An AI-driven approach to analgesia, for example, has been shown to lower postoperative pain scores by 33%.[10] Predictive models can also identify patients at high risk for adverse outcomes, allowing for proactive interventions and more efficient allocation of intensive care unit beds.[11] This personalized care extends beyond the hospital walls. Remote monitoring systems powered by AI can analyze data from wearable sensors to detect early signs of complications, enabling timely intervention and preventing readmissions. Studies show that AI-based predictive models can reduce hospital readmissions by up to 20%. AI is also streamlining the discharge process by generating high-quality, patient-friendly discharge summaries, reducing the clerical burden on clinicians, and empowering patients with clear instructions for their recovery.[12] Can we extend the AI role into prevention itself, changing reactive treatment to proactive prevention. AI algorithms excel at identifying subtle patterns in vast datasets that are invisible to the human eye, allowing clinicians to predict and mitigate risks before a patient ever enters the OR. A prime example is the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs), a common and costly complication. AI models have demonstrated remarkable accuracy in predicting SSIs, with some achieving an area under the curve score, a key measure of reliability, as high as 0.91. By integrating with Electronic Health Records, these AI-powered surveillance systems can enable real-time monitoring and reduce the manual labor of chart reviews by over 80%, allowing for more timely and targeted infection control strategies.[13] STRATEGIES AI offers immense promise in India, with its dual challenges of providing quality healthcare to a massive population and managing resource constraints, helps bridge the urban–rural healthcare divide and improve efficiency. The economic potential is substantial, with a 2022 Indian study projecting that AI-based treatment could generate savings of over $21,000 per day per hospital in its 1st year, rising to nearly $290,000 per day in its tenth.[14] While offering immense potential to improve healthcare in India, the adoption of AI faces significant hurdles. Key barriers include poor data infrastructure and algorithmic bias from nonrepresentative data, which can worsen health disparities. Clinicians express distrust in “black box” AI models, citing reliability as a major concern. A cultural resistance to change and a pronounced skills gap also impede progress. Furthermore, the absence of a clear regulatory framework creates legal uncertainty, particularly around liability for AI-related errors, which deters adoption and innovation. Overcoming these technical, clinical, cultural, and strategic barriers is crucial for India to fully harness AI’s transformative power in healthcare. Navigating these hurdles requires a deliberate, collaborative approach. We propose starting small, transforming the humble checklist – a proven tool for enhancing surgical safety – into a dynamic, AI-powered framework. This AI-enhanced structure can become an interactive guide, analyzing real-time data to provide personalized recommendations and risk alerts directly within the clinical workflow. Building such a system requires a systematic, phased approach that includes planning and design, data management, phased implementation and monitoring, and robust governance and accountability.[2] How to start off with the available infrastructure? Target the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist which is mandatory in most hospitals, and all health care workers are familiar. Then use a simple AI-powered platform, with your Data and IT team, deploy in your unit, scale it to the department and other surgical branches, and iterate as per the output. The lessons learnt along the way will be the stepping stones for the future. To conclude, the integration of AI into surgery cannot be rushed into an overnight change but a steady, deliberate evolution. The aim is not to foresee an autonomous “digital surgeon” but to develop a seamless collaboration between human and AI. By adopting a resource-aware structured approach, we can navigate the complexities of implementation, ensuring that this powerful technology is deployed safely, ethically, and effectively. This will usher in a new period of surgery – one that is smarter, safer, and ultimately allows surgeons more time to devote to the humane aspects of patient care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.358
GPT teacher head0.535
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine→Same topicSurgical Simulation and Training→French-language works237,207→