MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7118078192 · doi:10.5061/dryad.stqjq2cgj

GluN2B-specific NMDAR positive allosteric modulation reverses cognitive and behavioral abnormalities in Mecp2 and Disc1 transgenic mice

2025· dataset· en· W7118078192 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Ge

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllosteric regulationNMDA receptorHippocampal formationAllosteric modulatorAutismDISC1MECP2CognitionAutism spectrum disorderGenetically modified mouse

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The GluN2B subunit of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) plays a central role in synaptic development and plasticity, and its hypofunction is linked to autism spectrum disorder, severe neurodevelopmental delay, and other neuropsychiatric diseases. Therefore, enhancing the function of this NMDAR subunit may provide an effective therapeutic strategy for correcting synaptic and behavioral deficits associated with GluN2B-hypofunction. Here, we developed a class of GluN2B-selective positive allosteric modulators and characterized the pharmacological properties and binding site of the lead compound, 175. Systemic application of 175 facilitates hippocampal long-term depression in rats. Importantly, 175 restores performances in open-field exploration and three-chamber test in Mecp2 overexpression mice. Treatment with 175 also reverses behavioral abnormalities in open-field, Y-maze spontaneous alternation, three-chamber test, and pre-pulse inhibition in Disc1 mutant mice. Our findings introduce a pharmacological tool for selectively potentiating GluN2B-NMDARs function and highlight its therapeutic potential for cognitive and behavioral symptoms associated with GluN2B hypofunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→