Examining Family Stress as a Moderator in the Interplay Between Self-Efficacy and Quarter-Life Crisis Among Recent Graduates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The journey marked by commencement takes graduates to a new realm where they struggle to find a job to support them both financially and career-wise. As a result, many recent graduates might undergo stress and anxiety pertaining to their life ahead, which is known as a quarter-life crisis. This study aims to determine whether family stress can moderate the relationship between self-efficacy and quarter-life crisis. Through purposive sampling methods, a sample size of 226 recent graduates was selected. The Family Inventory of Life Events and Changes (FILE), the Quarter Life Crisis Scale, and the Self Efficacy Scale were used for this study. The analysis was performed using the Hayes macro process analysis. The data processing results obtained a significance of int_1 of 0.0451 (p < 0.05). The t-value of -2.01 means that the hypothesis was accepted, this case proves family stress has no direct effect on quarter-life crisis, but rather is a moderator on the connection of self-efficacy and quarter life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".