MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118190614 · doi:10.4000/15g2l

À Dieu ne plaise !

2002· article· fr· W7118190614 on OpenAlexaff
Luc Bureau

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie et cultures · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBecomingTerminology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Je suis né et j'ai grandi avec Dieu ; j'ai vieilli et je vais sans doute mourir sans lui. Qu'est-ce que cela change ? Je dirais, personnellement, que cela n'a pas changé grand-chose. Je mange mon potage, je me brosse les dents et je maugrée contre le mauvais temps comme je l'ai toujours fait. Je ne suis ni plus généreux, ni plus mesquin, ni plus subtil qu'avant. Je ne vais plus à l'église depuis longtemps, sauf à l'occasion de mariages ou de cérémonies funéraires. J'avoue qu'à ces moments-là...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1040.072

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie et culturesSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207