Exploring the Complexities and Possibilities of Digital Twin Technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Digital twin, a popular tool taking advantage of recent advancements on the Internet of Things (IoT), Machine Learning (ML), and Big Data, has rapidly received considerable attention in several fields with applications extending from smart city management to advanced VR/AR systems. We review the detailed investigations into the current research landscape related to digital twins, examining their use across these different fields, and comparing their applications, challenges, and potentials. In the realm of smart cities, creating a digital replica of the city infrastructure could significantly enhance urban planning, city management, and disaster response. Applying the digital twin technology within the smart city would surely bring its unique challenges and opportunities and meet the increasing requirements of city development. Additionally, as a platform for modeling and simulations in the manufacturing industry, digital twin creates virtual copies of these physical entities. By doing so, the digital twin application collects and analyzes unexpected data in manufacturing scenarios which eventually provides better decision making and increases productivity. In the VR/AR industry, the potential of digital twins reveals that this technology could be used for remote working environments, predictive health diagnostics, and personalized treatment plans for the healthcare domain. Although promising, digital twin technology also faces considerable challenges such as the complexities of data communication and accumulation, the dearth of data for training ML models, the need for massive processing power to support high fidelity twins, the high demand for interdisciplinary collaboration, and the absence of standardized development methodologies and validation measures. This paper, however, focuses on the positive aspects and benefits of digital twin technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.021 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".