Hubungan Kecemasan, Fungsi Kognitif dengan Kualitas Tidur pada Lansia di Panti Wreda Jakarta dan Tangerang
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Older people living in nursing homes are vulnerable to anxiety, cognitive impairment, and poor sleep quality. This study aimed to examine the association between anxiety, cognitive function, and sleep quality among older people residing in nursing homes in Jakarta and Tangerang. Methods: An analytic cross-sectional study was conducted among 124 residents from seven nursing homes using purposive sampling. Anxiety was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), cognitive function using the Indonesian version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-Ina), and sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Data was analyzed using chi-square tests and odds ratios. Results: Poor sleep quality was observed in 85.48% of participants, cognitive impairment in 83.87%, and anxiety in 29.31%. Anxiety (p = 0.03; OR = 3.46) and cognitive impairment (p = 0.01; OR = 7.15) were significantly associated with poor sleep quality. Conclusion: Anxiety and cognitive impairment are significantly associated with poor sleep quality among elderly nursing home residents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.027 | 0.046 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it