What's in a Genre? The audience experience(s) of palliata comedy and Roman mime
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: "What's in a Genre" reconstructs the experience of an audience attending a mime show. It supplements the limited evidence for early mime by comparing equivalent elements (e.g., masks, music, stage) in palliata comedy, and speculates on how loss or modification of the same would define the experience of mime, with the conclusion that comic digression largely defined early mime. Abstract: « What's in a Genre » reconstruit l'expérience d'un public assistant à un spectacle de mime. Il supplémente les témoignages limités concernant les premiers mimes en comparant certains éléments équivalents (e.g. masques, musique, scène) dans la comédie palliata et émet certaines hypothèses sur la manière dont la perte ou la modification de ceux-ci définirait l'expérience du mime. Il conclut que la digression comique était un marqueur important des premiers mimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".