MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118420552 · doi:10.15377/2409-5818.2025.12.1

Optimization of Solar Photovoltaics Tilt Angle for Hybrid Solar-Geothermal Heat Pump Applications in Extreme Cold Climate Regions of Northwestern Ontario, Canada

2025· article· W7118420552 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Basel I. Ismail, Anjali Nagi

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Energy Technology Research Updates · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersGoldcorpNorthwestern University
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemRenewable energySolar irradianceTilt (camera)Solar energyPhotovoltaicsIrradiance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global imperative to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, combat air pollution, and manage escalating energy costs and demand underscores the critical role of renewable energy technologies. Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems present a viable solution by directly converting sunlight into electricity, especially for energy-intensive facilities in regions with high solar potential, such as Northwestern Ontario, Canada. The tilt angle of a PV panel is a fundamental parameter that significantly influences the amount of incident solar radiation, thereby directly affecting the system's power output and overall economic efficiency. This study employs location-specific experimental data and validated numerical modeling to determine the optimal monthly and annual tilt angles for a PV array intended to potentially power a geothermal heat pump (GHP) at the Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre located in a severe cold climate region of Northwestern Ontario. Optimizing this angle enhances efficiency, reduces operating costs, and improves the commercial viability of the hybrid system. Analysis revealed that the monthly optimal tilt angle varies from 3° in June to a maximum of 69° in December and January. The annual fixed-angle optimum is approximately 39°. Solar irradiance peaks in June at roughly 5.14 kWh/m², falling to its annual minimum in December at about 49.2% of this peak. To specifically support the GHP during its peak heating demand, a winter-optimized tilt of 67° is recommended. This configuration captures an average maximum of 3.14 kWh/m²/day during the coldest months, aligning solar energy harvest with the facility's highest heating loads. Furthermore, the site experiences a substantial variation in available solar energy hours, with monthly average daily daylight hours ranging from a low of 8.2 hours (in December) to a high of 15.8 hours (in June). The estimated annual optimum tilt angle of 39° for TBRHSC aligns with the 31°–45° range reported for similar latitudes, and the corresponding predicted solar irradiance of 3.94 kWh/m²/day shows good agreement (<7% difference) with international benchmarks. The study's primary applied contribution is the proposal of a load-specific, winter-optimized tilt of 67°—a strategic adaptation designed to enhance the technical and economic feasibility of integrated solar-GHP systems operating under the harsh climatic constraints of Northwestern Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Energy Technology Research UpdatesSame topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207