MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118493661 · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf689

Discordance Between Online Information and Male Hypogonadism Clinical Guidelines: A Global Multilingual Content Analysis

2025· article· en· W7118493661 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bonnie Grant, Nipun Lakshitha de Silva, Maha Gumssani, Oliver Quinton, Isuru Lakmith Gamage, Waljit S. Dhillo, Mathis Grossmann, Channa Jayasena

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNIHR Sheffield Clinical Research FacilityMedical Research CentreNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
KeywordsHarmContent analysisEnforcementPublic healthLaw enforcementThe InternetMEDLINEAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Testosterone prescriptions have increased up to 12-fold globally over the past 2 decades. EU and UK law tightly regulate the advertising of medical products. OBJECTIVE: To review the accuracy of publicly accessible information on websites offering testosterone treatment. DESIGN/SETTING: Content analysis methodology using concept- and data-driven strategies to develop a coding frame for data extraction. Publicly accessible websites offering testosterone prescriptions were identified using predefined search terms, conducted in English, Arabic, Hindi, and Spanish, across 3 search engines. Virtual private network searches within multiple geographical regions were used to reduce location bias. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Accuracy of extracted data determined using international guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 253/1138 websites were included (144 US/Canada; 48 Europe; 17 Australia; 12 Asia; 11 South America; 10 Middle East). The following non-guideline-based practices (with numbers/percentages of clinics) were identified: routinely use nontestosterone androgens or testosterone secretagogues (eg, gonadotrophins) to treat symptomatic low testosterone (61/253; 24.4%); testosterone treatment reduces cardiovascular risk (52/253; 20.6%); microdosing improves treatment effects (30/253; 11.9%); testosterone is prescribed for men with normal serum testosterone (>12 nmol/L; 25/253;9.9%); testosterone has antiaging effects (25/253; 9.9%). US-based clinics more frequently made non-guideline-based claims compared with other geographical locations. CONCLUSION: We identify serious and frequent breaches of advertising law and regulations by clinics around the world offering testosterone treatment, with the potential to cause harm to men. We recommend enforcement of existing laws by national regulators to address this widespread public health challenge and align patient expectations with clinical guidelines for the safe treatment of men.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.048
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.202
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0480.202
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0160.020
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207