MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Revisión del inventario fonético-fonológico del aymara hablado en Chile y su vitalidad: un estudio basado en análisis acústicos y espectrográficos

2025· article· W7118512452 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniela Mena Sanhueza, Darío Fuentes Grandón, Mauricio Figueroa Candia

Bibliographic record

VenueAlpha Revista de Artes Letras y Filosofía · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSample (material)Identity (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar los fonos y fonemas del aymara hablado en Chile. A partir de una muestra de 17.938 sonidos de esta lengua, se busca proponer un inventario en base al de Poblete y Salas (1997) y a la realización de estudios acústico-estadísticos, análisis espectrográficos y con especial atención a la vitalidad de los fonemas. Los resultados indican que todos los fonemas se realizan fonéticamente como se esperaba, que las variaciones presentes concuerdan con lo reportado en estudios previos y que, en términos fonológicos, la lengua se mantiene altamente vital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.253
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlpha Revista de Artes Letras y FilosofíaSame topicPhonetics and Phonology ResearchFrench-language works237,207