MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118560093 · doi:10.4000/15g4c

Chapitre VIII. Un chantier exemplaire : Vaux-le-Vicomte

2010· book-chapter· fr· W7118560093 on OpenAlex
Bénédicte Gady

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Plan (archaeology)MiracleDerogation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chantier majeur tant sur le plan historique qu’artistique, Vaux occupe une place centrale dans l’imaginaire collectif. Au mythe du Grand Siècle s’ajoute celui de Nicolas Fouquet, le surintendant des Finances fastueux et imprudent, mécène et prévaricateur, dont le chef-d’œuvre par miracle conservé aurait servi de préface aux grandes pages de Versailles. Sous la figure du Vicomte de Bragelonne ou l’image du Soleil offusqué, Fouquet avait trouvé en Alexand

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0170.026
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it