MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118652712 · doi:10.62347/dycw8415

Effect of auricular pressure bean combined with wrist-ankle needle on cognitive function and prognosis in migraine patients with anxiety and depression disorders

2025· article· en· W7118652712 on OpenAlex
Wen Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Translational Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMigraineDepression (economics)AnxietyCognitionCortical spreading depressionQuality of life (healthcare)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To investigate the effects of auricular pressure bean combined with wrist-ankle needle on cognitive function and prognosis in migraine patients with comorbid anxiety and depressive disorders.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 99 migraine patients treated at Hefei First People's Hospital between January and December 2023.Based on therapeutic protocols, participants were allocated into auricular pressure bean group (n=22), wrist-ankle needle group (n=20), and combined group (combined auricular pressure bean with wrist-ankle needle, n=57).Pain intensity, depression severity, anxiety severity, cognitive function, and quality of life across three groups were compared before treatment and at 4 weeks post-treatment.Patient migraine recurrence after 3 months was recorded.Pearson correlation analysis was employed to assess the correlation between improvement in anxiety and depression scores and improvement in cognitive function scores.Results: After treatment, all three groups showed a decreasing trend in Visual Analogue Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores (all P<0.05).The combined therapy group had lower scores than other groups (all P<0.05).Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were increased across all groups, with the combined therapy group scoring the highest (all P<0.05).Statistically significant differences existed in recurrence rates among the three groups (P<0.05).Improvements in anxiety and depression symptoms were positively correlated with cognitive function improvements across all treatment modalities (P<0.05).Conclusion: The combined therapy can significantly relieve the pain and anxiety and depression symptoms of migraine patients, improve cognitive function and quality of life, and reduce recurrence rate.It shows better efficacy than single therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it