MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118709032 · doi:10.17169/refubium-47075

Metabolomics as tool for the early detection of diagnostic biomarkers in antidoping field

2024· dissertation· en· W7118709032 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Patrizia Maria Leogrande

Bibliographic record

VenueRefubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWorld Anti-Doping Agency
KeywordsMetabolomicsWorkflowFragmentation (computing)MetabolomePreprocessorChemometricsDrug development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis focuses on the exploration of the metabolomics approach as a guided tool in the field of anti-doping by defining a workflow based on the synergy between High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry and chemometric tools. First, the optimization of a low-energy electron ionization source to maximize the formation of molecular ion and minimize the fragmentation degree of steroid pathways, preserving the specific fragmentation pathway of the steroids considered and increasing the m/z coverage range. To this end, the effects of electron energy, emission current and source temperature on steroid fragmentation pathways were studied by performing full factorial experimental designs, using steroid reference materials chosen to cover the entire urinary steroid profile. Second, the development and validation of systematic metabolomics workflows to reduce the time and resources required to identify direct drug metabolites for GCHRMS. To do so, the administration of 7-keto-DHEA was studied as a Proof-of-Concept to highlight the strong synergy between high-resolution mass spectrometry and chemometric tools for early detection of drug metabolites in anti-doping. A comparison of the most significant features with the spectra library validated the proposed metabolomics approach, further supported by existing data in the literature. Third, extension of the previously proposed workflow on GCHRMS data to LCHRMS data, development and validation. The primary differences between the two workflows lie in the method validation, sample analysis processes, including preparation and acquisition, as well as in the raw data preprocessing steps. This knowledge gives the opportunity to gain insight into all possible metabolic changes, regardless of whether it is the formation of new compounds or the reduction of compounds. In contrast, the metabolite-focused approach generally reduces the scope of investigation to the formation of metabolites from the parent molecule, thus losing the response that other endogenous compounds might have as a result of its intake. Fourth, application of the developed workflow for the investigation of the physiological and post training effects of ecdisteroid supplementation on the human serum metabolome. These outcomes elucidates the effectiveness of a metabolomics-based approach in detecting specific trends related to the intake of performance-enhancing substances that would otherwise remain undetected through traditional analytical methods or be masked by physiological changes. The results presented in this thesis are of relevance for a more depth understanding of the complex relationships between different steroids, which may not be apparent when examining individual steroids in isolation, and in the identification of patterns or combinations of steroids that may discover new biomarkers for disease diagnosis, prognosis, or monitoring. This is a step forward in the metabolic characterization of different physio-pathological conditions that allow for the personalization of treatment strategies and optimization of individual performance outcomes. This personalized treatment enhances the value of the proposed metabolomics approach, making it beneficial not only for improving sports performance, but also in the clinical setting, where targeted supplementation can promote better health and recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRefubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin)Same topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFrench-language works237,207