MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118880367 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.151015

Enhancing Security Service Efficiency Through Risk Management: Analyzing the Impact of Employee Leave Patterns at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences

2025· article· W7118880367 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Khaled Mili, Shaykhah Abdullah Aldossari

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicOrganizational and Employee Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Faisal UniversityDeanship of Scientific Research, King Faisal University
KeywordsJob securityOccupational safety and healthHealth servicesService (business)BinHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Security service efficiency in higher education institutions depends critically on workforce availability, yet the relationship between employee leave patterns and operational performance remains understudied.This study investigates this relationship at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences through mixed-methods research combining quantitative analysis of 2,363 leave instances (2022-2024), surveys of 160 stakeholders, and semi-structured interviews with 15 security managers.Temporal analysis identified pronounced leave clustering on weekends (45.9%) and during January, August, and November.Correlation analysis revealed significant relationships between absence rates and security coverage (r = -0.71,p < 0.001), incident response times (r = 0.74, p < 0.001), and incident frequency (r = 0.68, p < 0.01).Monte Carlo simulations of three risk mitigation scenarios demonstrated that comprehensive leave management could reduce response times by 37.4% and incidents by 48.6%, with projected annual net benefits of SAR 330,000.Findings establish absence management as a critical component of security risk management in educational institutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicOrganizational and Employee PerformanceFrench-language works237,207