MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119083665 · doi:10.1386/public_00274_1

Fragile Foundations

2025· article· en· W7119083665 on OpenAlexaff
Tapo Chimbganda

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican studies and sociopolitical issues
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrivingDignityDeclarationPlan (archaeology)Legislation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nobuhle has spent a lifetime surviving and scraping by in the shadows of Bulawayo, her dignity traded for shelter. But everything changes when she steps into her own two-room house in Nkulumane 12. It’s just a concrete box in a dusty, unforgiving neighbourhood, but it’s hers. No landlord. No broken promises. For the first time, she has a home, which means she owns her future. The rough walls, the narrow bathroom, and the zinc door are the bare minimum, but she sees a canvas. Home is where Nobuhle is becoming. Painted walls, luxurious furnishings, and a thriving home-based business. Every plan she makes is a declaration of self-worth, a promise to herself. What happens when a woman who never knew freedom or grace becomes a homeowner? What does home represent? Home is where survival gives way to vision, and a woman who was once invisible now dares to dream.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublicSame topicAfrican studies and sociopolitical issuesFrench-language works237,207