MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119089311 · doi:10.4000/15g4l

Liste des abréviations

2010· book-chapter· fr· W7119089311 on OpenAlexaff
Bénédicte Gady

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLine (geometry)Context (archaeology)Term (time)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Albertina : Graphische Sammlung Albertina, VienneArch. nat. : Archives nationales, ParisBibl. nat. : Bibliothèque nationale de France, Parisc.pl. : coup de plancheE.N.S.B.-A. : École nationale supérieure des beaux-arts, Parisépr.r. : épreuve rognéeEst. : département des Estampes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0140.021
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5930.467

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme eBooksSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207