MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119125830 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.201132

Environmental Impacts and Strategic Responses in Agricultural Transformation: A SWOT–TOWS Analysis of Dong Nai Province, Vietnam

2025· article· W7119125830 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicStrategic Planning and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureEnvironmental impact assessmentAgricultural productivitySustainabilityEnvironmental degradation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the environmental and strategic dimensions of agricultural development in Dong Nai Province, Vietnam, through the application of an integrated SWOT-TOWS analytical framework.Situated within the context of accelerating climate change, land-use pressures, and digital transformation, the research investigates how environmental challenges influence the province's transition toward sustainable agriculture.The analysis reveals that Dong Nai possesses key comparative advantages-including fertile agricultural land, favorable geographic location, and a strong labor base-that provide a foundation for modernization and green growth.However, weaknesses such as limited technological adoption, fragmented value chains, and labor migration continue to constrain ecological efficiency.These vulnerabilities, compounded by external threats such as climate variability, water stress, and market volatility, highlight the urgency of formulating adaptive and environmentally responsible strategies.Through the TOWS matrix, the study identifies five strategic pathways: (1) digital transformation for precision and resource-efficient farming; (2) promotion of climate-smart and low-emission agricultural practices; (3) enhancement of value-chain integration and green certification; (4) mobilization of investment for sustainable infrastructure; and (5) human-capital development for environmental innovation.These strategies are further operationalized through measurable KPIs, implementation timelines, lead agencies, and financing mechanisms aligned with Decision 2327/Q-UBND (2023), ensuring policy feasibility and accountability.The findings contribute to the broader discourse on sustainable rural transformation by integrating strategic-management tools with sustainability and environmental-impact assessment principles.The Dong Nai case demonstrates how local agricultural systems can align with global sustainability goals-particularly SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), and SDG 13 (Climate Action)thereby offering a replicable framework for environmentally informed agricultural planning in developing economies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it