Ruim porque proibido ou proibido porque ruim?: “Procurando Jane”, “O acontecimento” e o direito ao aborto seguro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article seeks to discuss the experience of abortion in the context of its criminalization. To do so, based on a methodological proposal of law in literature, two literary works will be analyzed: Happening by Annie Ernaux (2022), based on the author's real-life experience in France in the 1960s; and Looking for Jane by Heather Marshall (2022), a work of fiction set in Canada between 1971 and 1980. While Ernaux's work will be used to discuss the termination of pregnancy as an individual and intimate experience, Marshall's book allows for considerations on abortion as a collective struggle of women. The article develops considerations on both aspects, seeking to translate them to the Brazilian reality, given that, unlike the two countries where the studied books take place, abortion is still considered a crime in Brazil. It is concluded that it is important for the Brazilian legal system to understand the decriminalization of abortion as an expression of women's human rights, so that individuals with uteruses can live their sexuality and reproductive rights with autonomy and dignity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".