PENGARUH BEBAN KERJA DAN DISIPLIN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of workload and work discipline on employee performance at PT. Meisa Agro Perkasa. The research instrument was tested through validity and reliability tests, with all items declared valid and reliable. The classical assumption test showed that the data were free from multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, and normally distributed. The results of multiple linear regression analysis indicate that workload and work discipline significantly influence employee performance. Partially, work discipline has a positive and significant effect on performance, while workload is also significant but interpreted as having a negative effect. The F-test indicates that both independent variables simultaneously influence employee performance. The adjusted R² value of 0.590 indicates that 59% of the variation in employee performance can be explained by these two variables. This study emphasizes the importance of workload management and improving work discipline to support employee productivity and effectiveness in the company.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it