Entre o circus e o forum: poder, amor e amantes na Ars Amatoria de Ovídio (Séc. I a.C.- l d.C.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this dissertation, we investigate the relations of love and power in the Augustan Urbs protagonized by the women depicted by the latin poet Publius Ovidius Naso, commonly known as Ovid. To that end, we take as our source Ars Amatoria, the elegy series written by this author between the years of I BC and I AD which teaches relationship skills to the citizens of imperial Rome. The temporal fragment under consideration in our study spans the second half of the first BC century and the first quarter of the following century, period wherein August founded the Principate and imposed to Roman society a program of Moral Reform. In this context, our main objective is to comprehend, in the light of Ars Amatoria, the poet's support of and tensions again the emperor's dictates. Hence we analyze the romantic relationships experienced by Ovid's female characters and examine how he conceived and utilized the spaces of Augustus's city in the scope of such relationships. The theoretical framework adopted in this work is that of Cultural History, guided by the concepts of representation, gender, city, body and coquetry. Furthermore, we employ the research methodology of Content Analysis. Lastly, we reason that Ovid devised writing strategies to express his conceptions of love in Ars Amatoria, without necessarily being punished by the emperor. Accordingly, we demonstrate that the poet did not confront, publicly and explicitly, the ruler's power and his program of Moral Reform, but, at the same time, that he proposed advices that promoted conflicting behaviors to the reformulation of social norms designed by Augustus
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".