Osteossarcoma apendicular em tíbia: relato de caso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O osteossarcoma ou sarcoma osteogênico é a neoplasia óssea primária mais diagnosticada no cão sendo responsável de 80% a 85% das neoplasias com origem no esqueleto. O osteossarcoma é caracterizado pelo crescimento de células neoplásicas que formam osso imaturo e ou osteóide, apresentando comprtamento agressivo tanto no local do crescimento quanto na formação de metástases, causando grave desagregação do osso acomentido. O osteossarcoma ocorre em cães de média idade, em torno de 7 anos. Cães de raças grandes ou gigantes são suscetíveis ao desenvolvimento do tumor, tais como Great Dane, Greyhound, Rottweiler, Fila Brasileiro, São Bernardo, Dinamarquês, Setter Irlandês, Doberman, Pastor Alemão, Golden Retriever, Boxer, Labrador e Mastiff. A amputação tem sido a opção disponível para o tratamento de osteossarcoma. Entretanto, 85% dos cães, que são submetidos a esse procedimento morrem após um ano, devido à metástase. Após este período, 15% dos cães que não desenvolveram metástases, são considerados curados. Neste relato será abordado o caso clínico de um cão mestiço das raças Fila Brasileiro e Mastiff Inglês, fêmea, que desenvolveu osteossarcoma apendicular na região proximal da tíbia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".