MODELAGEM E SIMULAÇÃO NUMÉRICA DO PROCESSO DE DRENAGEM EM MINA A CÉU ABERTO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente trabalho tem o objetivo de realizar uma modelagem, baseada no método numéricode diferenças finitas através do modelo de fluxo de água subterrânea, MODFLOW que se encontraincorporado ao programa PMWIN Pro. A modelagem foi aplicada em uma mina de kimberlito, emfase de planejamento, do projeto intitulado Victor Diamonds da empresa DeBeers Canada naprovíncia Ontário no Canadá. O mineral de interesse é o diamante e está situado no interior de duaschaminés adjacentes de kimberlito que atravessam formações de rochas em camadas que atingemuma profundidade de aproximadamente 200 metros. Para o planejamento seguro de um sistema dedesaguamento, foram realizadas simulações alternativas, por meio do programa MODFLOW, queoriginou resultados satisfatórios e bastante similares aos resultados da simulação efetuada porHydrologic Consultants, Inc., e que pode ser confirmado por meio dos resultados mostrados nosmapas potenciométricos, corte vertical da mina escavada, extensão dos cones de rebaixamento e dacurva de rebaixamento no interior da mina Victor projetada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".