MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119365305

Organizações comunitárias de prestação de serviço de água em Villavicencio (Colômbia) : repercussões, desafios e propostas para o fornecimento de água nas cidades

2022· dissertation· es· W7119365305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resource Management and Quality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater supplyPoliticsCommunity organizationPublic serviceParticipatory action researchService providerSocioeconomic statusCollective actionAction research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research analyzes community water supply organizations, their effects (symbolic, political and technical), as well as possibilities of articulation and complementarity with public management. For this purpose, three community water service organizations were selected in the city of Villavicencio, Colombia. Located where the eastern mountain range of the Colombian Andes meets the region known as Llanos Orientales, in the center of the country, Villavicencio has 531,275 inhabitants and has undergone strong urban and socioeconomic transformations in the last twenty years. The main provider of water supply services in the city is the Empresa de Acueducto y Alcantarillado de Villavicencio (EAAV), a public company that has been criticized for various technical and administrative deficiencies, such as extended service cuts. In this context, a multiplicity of private and community providers have emerged in the urban area, challenging the idea that the universal and industrial water distribution model is a natural monopoly and the only - and ideal - way for water supply in the cities. Through an action research methodology, this work, carried out between 2017 and 2022, employed various qualitative methodological procedures such as participant observation, semi-structured interviews, community censuses and participatory workshops. Guided by the political ecology approach, the "commons" perspective of the Theory of Collective Action (Ostrom, 2011), and Dardot and Laval's (2010, 2015) arguments about "the common" as a political process, this research raises three main considerations. First, it questions the technical relevance and social effects of the "big system" of water infrastructure networks. Second, although community water organizations also present conflicts and difficulties, they can be recognized as a flexible and more democratic supply model, where community organizations have also given rise to broader social movements that question the principles - normative and ideological - that underpin the water services management in Colombia. Third, and as a general proposal of this research, it suggests the possibility of articulating public action with community water supply strategies at a local scale, forging new paradigms of water service management that are more democratic, more sustainable and more relevant to the reality of the cities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it