Application of Calgary Model for evaluation of families of elerly hospitalized under palliative care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis is constituted by three articles, one theoretical, entitled Scientific Production about the elderly person in palliative care: a bibliometric study and two originals: Structural evaluation, developmental, and functional of families of elderly patients with cancer in palliative care; and Family Evaluation of elderly patients with Brain Vascular Accident in palliative care. Objective: to analyze the structure, the development and functionality of elderly patients family without therapeutic possibilities of cure in palliative care in the light of Calgary Model of Family Evaluation (CMFE). Method: The proposed search is a field research, of qualitative nature. The study was performed in a hospital, located in the city of João Pessoa, capital of the State of Paraíba. The investigation sample was composed by ten families, each one represented by the patient under palliative care and one family companion. The project was appreciated and approved by the Committee of Ethics in Research of the University Hospital Lauro Wanderley, from the Federal University of Paraíba (CER/UHLW), according to approval certificate with registration CAAE, number 33261114.1.0000.5183. Data were collected in the period from August to September 2014. For data collection was utilized the interview technique and genogram and eco-map instruments, that are utilized in CMFE. Empirical material was analyzed qualitatively in the light of CMFE. Results: From the ten families selected for the study, five had a common point, in other words, patients with cancer diagnosis, and five, with Brain Vascular Accident (BVA) diagnosis. For that, this material enabled the construction of two articles. The application of the referred model allowed identifying in the search with the family of elderly patients with cancer that two of them preserved the nuclear structure. The families presented low education level and financial difficulties. Regarding the network of social support, most mentioned relatives, friends and church. Two referred to have family relation with conflicts and limited social contact. The family caregivers are female. The article with the patients’ family with BVA allowed identifying that the five families that preserved nuclear structure, presented low education level and financial difficulties. They had as social support network relatives, friends and church. All of them referred to have family relation with conflicts. Conclusion: Family system and social, cultural contexts where the elderly patients with cancer and BVA families in palliative care participants in the research are inserted, can influence the way to direct these care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".