MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7119403295

The effect of ground pilates training in fragile institutionalized elderly people at risk of fragilization

2022· dissertation· pt· W7119403295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tatiana Lima Boletini

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElderly peopleVulnerability (computing)Frailty IndexIntervention (counseling)Older peopleGrip strengthActivities of daily livingFrailty syndrome
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frailty is a syndrome that involves declines in multiple domains, generating increased mortality and adverse events in the health of the elderly. Studies point to the importance of reducing sedentary lifestyle in institutionalized elderly, as changes in aging can be aggravated by new living conditions, making elderly people vulnerable to frailty. Thus, the Mat Pilates Method (MPS) presents itself as a powerful methodological proposal for the elderly population, although in the institutionalized elderly it is still little explored. The objective was to investigate the effect of MPS training on institutionalized elderly people at different levels of frailty, in physical, psychological and social aspects. The sample consisted of 26 frail elderly people at risk of frailty, all institutionalized, divided into two groups: Control Group (CG) and Intervention Group (IG). The elderly were submitted to frailty screening, using the Clinical-Functional Vulnerability Index – 20 (IVCF-20), and evaluated every 3 and 6 months using the Fried Frailty Phenotype and Edmonton Frailty Scale instruments to verify the level of frailty and its indicators according to physical, psychological and social aspects. Elderly people from IG participated in MPS classes, twice a week, lasting 1 hour/class for 6 months. After the intervention, the GI showed a decline in the level of frailty, indicating a significant improvement when compared to the CG, in relation to the physical aspects, the GI showed significant improvements through the indicators functional performance, increased grip strength and slow gait, while the CG showed a significant difference in weight loss; in the psychological aspects, the GI showed improvements in the cognition and mood indicators, while no significant differences were observed in the social aspects. The MPS had a strong influence on the decline in frailty of institutionalized elderly. It is concluded that the MPS had significant effects in relation to the level of frailty of the elderly in terms of physical and psychological aspects. Intervention with the pilates method altered the process of fragilization of the elderly in its various levels, attenuating the institutional vulnerability in which they found themselves at the beginning of the research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→