Percezione del dolore nei motociclisti dilettanti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: Determinar a prevalência da percepção de dor em pilotos de MotoCross amadores da Liga Esportiva de Motociclismo do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Métodos: A amostra foi composta de 27 atletas do sexo masculino, com 40,63±5,15 de idade, participantes do Campeonato Estadual do Rio de Janeiro. Foi aplicado o teste de McGill a fim de mensurar as dores que os atletas sentem mediante a prática esportiva. Resultados: Os resultados mostram que na descrição de dor de dimensão SENSORIAL, para os descritores, (CÓLICA e a MORDIDA) foram obtidas as menores médias (0,19). O descritor (DOLORIDA) apresentou a maior média (0,97). Já na descrição de dor de dimensão AFETIVA, o descritor (CASTIGANTE) obteve a menor média (0,84). O descritor (AMEDRONTADA) apresentou a maior média. A média da EVA (Escala Visual Analógica) (1,07) e a média do desvio padrão (1,76). Conclusão: Os atletas não apresentaram uma diferença significante nos níveis de dor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".