A contrapelo da agenda pós: ciência, cultura e educação em Nietzsche
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis problematizes the appropriation of Nietzschean philosophy by a particular sector of Brazilian scientific research in Education, whose theoretical framework is associated with what Ellen Wood (1996) names the Postmodern agenda. By taking into account the current scenario of neoliberal globalization of capitalism, the following research question is posed: to what extent can Nietzsche's criticism of the economicist instrumentalization imposed by industrial expansion on German culture and the educational system in his time – as elaborated in On the future of our teaching institutions (NIETZSCHE, 1979, 2014) – contribute, nowadays, to theoretical reflection on an emancipatory educational project that is rid of both market impositions and the affirmation of subjective characters such as intellectual independence and creative freedom? The central objective of the study is to show that by countering the critical (anti-dogmatic and anti-capitalist) with relativist perspectives, it is possible to reposition Nietzsche's philosophy within the scope of Brazilian scientific research in the field of Education. We thus argue Nietzsche's philosophy is situated within the critical tradition - namely, a theoretical domain committed to anti-dogmatism and anti-capitalism, respectively guided by the denial of reality taken for granted and by the envisioning of its overcoming. The literature review shows that as far as this critical perspective is concerned, Nietzsche's contribution to critical conceptions of the philosophy of Education has fallen into oblivion in the critical field of the philosophy of education, especially with regard to his theorizing on overcoming the capitalist system. Concomitantly, there is, to a large extent, an alignment of research in Education with the relativist reception of Nietzschean thought. The central hypothesis of the thesis is that in his first productive phase, Nietzsche develops a critical (HEIT; PICHLER, 2015; HEIT, 2018), non-relativist (MARTON, 2011a; AZEREDO, 2012; MARTON 2020), perspectivist phylosophy (CORBANEZI, 2013; MATTOS, 2013; DALLA VECCHIA, 2014), which is connected to a particular type of naturalism – liberal, non-scientificist, experimental, perspectivist (SCHACHT, 2011; LOPES, 2011a; HEIT, 2015; CARVALHO, 2018; ITAPARICA, 2018). Nietzsche's anti-dogmatism thematized in this thesis is based on our questioning of the legitimacy of what a significant part of scholarly work advocates: programmatically, the philosopher is thought to have cultivated an alleged enmity towards the sciences. We take issue with this view by underscoring the intense, long-lasting and historically necessary imbrication between Nietzschean thought and the scientific field. Based on translations of Nietzsche´s works into Portuguese (1979,1992a, 1992b, 1995, 1998, 2000a, 2000b, 2001a, 2001b, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2008, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2020a, 2020b) and on stances taken by a number of commentators, we conclude that Nietzsche positioned himself both as an enthusiast of the scientific method and a critic of the dogmatism the sciences inherited from metaphysical tradition; of thematic specialization as well as of the pragmatic instrumentalization of scientific production. As for the cultural and educational transformation that was going on in Germany in the second half of the 19th century, it will be shown that Nietzsche's On the future of our teaching institutions (NIETZSCHE, 2014) offers consistent answers to the research question that guides the study. The contribution of Nietzschean thought as a basis for current critical research in education (anti-dogmatic and anti-capitalist) is also confirmed in the dialogue between the nineteenth-century philosopher's analyses and those elaborated by contemporary sociologist Christian Laval (2019) in Schools are not companies: neoliberal attack on public education, a book in which Nietzsche's view regarding education constrained by the impositions of efficacy is thought of as premonitory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".